In partnership with

🚀 | TL;DR

  • We’re already seeing a steady stream of strong AI companies coming out of our network, with real traction and experienced founders behind them

  • The gap comes down to consistent access to aligned capital early enough to matter

  • Over time, we’ve built a pipeline of 200+ on-thesis companies by staying close to where these founders are building

  • Our edge comes from being embedded in founder communities and seeing opportunities before they become widely competitive

  • This builds directly on what we’ve already been doing, now with capital behind it

    What to watch: How quickly we translate this pipeline into real allocations and start building a portfolio that reflects the access we already have.

🔭 | What We’re Seeing

If you zoom out, something pretty clear starts to show up.

A lot of the founders coming out of our network aren’t just early builders; instead, many are already working on real companies that are starting to matter. You can clearly see it in the outcomes. Companies like Replit, now around $9B, Applied Intuition at ~$15B, and Clay at ~$5B didn’t come out of nowhere. They’re part of a broader pattern of founders building in AI, infrastructure, and software, often from networks that just aren’t as visible to the broader venture ecosystem.

And that’s really the point: the talent is there, the outcomes are there, but consistent access hasn’t been.

We’ve been seeing more and more of these companies up close. We’ve met with dozens of early-stage teams working on things like healthcare AI infrastructure, lab automation, or niche marketplaces that already have real usage behind them. We’re not talking about polished pitch decks, but actual products with early signals, whether that’s customers, traction, or just strong pull from the right users.

Most of these companies don’t show up in the typical places right away. They’re not always coming through the same networks or getting surfaced in the same cycles. By the time they do, they’re already competitive.

So the opportunity isn’t about finding something no one else has seen. It’s about being close enough to see it earlier, with enough context to actually do something about it.

🧩 | The Gap (Why This Exists)

When you look at it from both sides, the same problem shows up in slightly different ways.

On the founder side, a lot of strong teams are still piecing things together when it comes to capital. They might have early traction, a real product, and a clear direction, but access to the right investors isn’t always there early on. It’s usually fragmented, relationship-driven, and harder to navigate if you’re not already inside the typical venture circles.

On the investor side, it’s almost the inverse. There’s no shortage of capital, but access to high-quality opportunities is inconsistent. Deal flow can feel either too broad or too filtered, and by the time something clearly stands out, it’s already competitive and harder to get into in a meaningful way.

No matter how you look at it, it comes back to the same issue. Founders are building without consistent access to aligned capital, and investors are trying to find high-quality opportunities before they become competitive, but rarely see them early enough, which is exactly the disconnect we’ve been leaning into.

🛠️ | What We’ve Built

Over time, we’ve been getting closer and closer to where these companies actually start.

Through the newsletter, the community, and the relationships we’ve been building, we’ve developed a pipeline that’s both consistent and on thesis, with companies showing up early enough to matter. Right now, that looks like access to 200+ companies that fit what we’re focused on, with founders who have collectively raised over $6B across their careers. More importantly, these aren’t just names on a list. These are companies we’re seeing as they’re being built, often before they’re widely visible or formally raising.

You can see it in the types of things coming through. AI infrastructure for healthcare compliance, automation tools for research labs, marketplaces that already have real usage behind them. They’re in different categories, but you start to notice the same pattern: early traction, strong technical founders, and a clear sense of where they’re going.

At some point, it stopped feeling like we were going out looking for deals and more like we were already in the middle of them.

🤝 | Why Founders Actually Want Dhow

It goes without saying, but this only works if founders actually want to work with us. At the early stage, capital is everywhere, so what founders actually end up paying attention to is everything around it.

That’s where we’ve naturally been able to show up a bit differently. A lot of the founders we’re working with are thinking beyond just raising a round; they care about who’s in their corner early, how they get initial traction, and how quickly they can build momentum once they’re in front of the right people.

Through the newsletter and the broader Dhow network, we’ve built a distribution layer that helps founders get early visibility. Right now, that includes a community of over 4,000 founders and investors, along with consistent reach through content that’s already in front of people actively thinking about venture.

It’s not just about exposure; it’s about context. Founders are stepping into a network where people actually understand what they’re building and can help move things forward, whether that’s early users, feedback, or investor introductions, so when we show up early, it’s not just as a check; we’re already part of how these companies start to gain traction.

| The Fund

All of this is what led to Dhow Horizon Fund I. We’re raising a $5M fund to invest in early-stage technology companies, with a focus on AI and founders from the Muslim world and diaspora, with the goal of building a portfolio of around 15 to 20 companies that reflect what we’ve already been seeing: strong technical founders, early traction, and large markets.

From a structure standpoint, we’re keeping it straightforward. Capital is pooled at the fund level, and we handle sourcing, diligence, and allocation internally. Investments are executed through SPVs on the backend, but from an investor perspective, it functions as a single fund.

We’re also partnering with Decile Group to handle infrastructure, compliance, and operational support as we build this out, and we’ve already brought in our first institutional check, which has been a strong early signal.

At a high level, we’re taking the pipeline, access, and relationships we already have and turning them into something we can deploy capital through consistently.

📈 | How We Think About Returns

At this stage, returns really come down to a few companies that end up working in a big way. That’s why getting in early matters so much. When you’re investing before things are fully formed or competitive, the upside looks completely different, and it becomes less about getting everything right and more about being in the right ones early enough for it to count.

You can see this in how some of the best companies compound. Early investors in companies like Ramp or Replit saw outcomes that don’t come from incremental growth; instead they come from being in early enough on something that scales.

So the focus isn’t on trying to predict everything perfectly; rather it’s on consistently getting into the right companies early, with enough ownership for it to matter if they work. That’s how we’re thinking about building the portfolio. Keep it focused, stay early, and give ourselves enough shots at companies that can actually return the fund.

🏹 | Why We Win

At the end of the day, this comes down to where we sit.

We’re not trying to compete once a round is already forming. Most of the time, by then, the best opportunities are already crowded and priced accordingly. We’re seeing a lot of these companies earlier, when they’re still forming, still iterating, and not yet widely visible.

That comes from being embedded in the right places: founder communities, accelerators, and networks where these companies actually start and gain traction. Over time, that starts to turn into consistent access, mainly because we’re already in the middle of where these companies are coming from.

There’s also a trust component to this. When founders know you, understand how you think, and have already seen how you show up, the dynamic changes. Instead of being another investor showing up late, you’re someone they already know and are comfortable bringing in early.

And candidly, that’s really where the advantage comes from, not just seeing opportunities, but being early enough and close enough to actually do something with them.

🧭 | The Dhow Perspective

If you step back, this lines up with a broader shift in how early-stage venture actually works. It’s becoming less about who has capital and more about who has access. The firms that consistently get into the best companies early aren’t just better at evaluating them; they’re already close to the people building them before anything formal happens.

That’s part of why community is starting to matter more, not in a surface-level way, but as a real sourcing layer. When you’re embedded in the right networks, you naturally see things earlier and with more context.

For us, the focus has been on building that within a specific segment. Founders from the Muslim world and other values-aligned diaspora are already building across AI and software, but the network around them is still fragmented, which creates an opportunity to be more intentional about how capital and access come together.

And when you zoom out, it starts to look more like a question of who’s already in the room before those deals even take shape.

| Bottom Line

If you look at everything we’ve been doing, this feels like a pretty natural step.

We’ve been building relationships, getting closer to where these companies actually start, and spending time around the kinds of founders we want to back. Over time, that’s turned into real access and a pipeline we understand well.

At a certain point, it made sense to put structure around that and start deploying capital in a more consistent way. That’s precisely what Horizon Fund I is. It’s a way to take what’s already working and turn it into something we can execute on at scale.

We’re not trying to be everywhere. We’re focused on staying close to a specific group of founders, getting in early, and being in a position to actually matter when it counts.

We’re currently bringing on aligned investors through PACT agreements and keeping the group intentionally tight. If you want to learn more or get involved early, feel free to reach out. Just reply “Deep Dive” + Horizon


At Dhow, we’ve spent a lot of time studying how early-stage investing actually plays out in practice. What consistently shows up is that access and timing matter just as much as analysis. By the time a company is fully visible, a lot of the advantage has already been competed away. That’s shaped how we think about building this. Staying close to where founders are building, understanding what’s working early, and being in a position to act before things become crowded. Horizon Fund I is really an extension of that approach. Taking what we’ve been seeing and formalizing it into something we can consistently invest behind.

If this way of thinking resonates, share this with someone who looks at venture the same way. Join the movement and share this with a friend (or two).

This billionaire strategy beat the S&P 500 by 3.1x from 2017-2025. Here's how to get in.

That’s not by picking the right stock or timing the market. It’s by holding three real asset classes in one strategy.

It’s anchored by an investment typically exclusive to billionaires.

Could be good timing too–

Bloomberg's Marcus Ashworth recently wrote, there’s "no more reliable safe havens."

The S&P, while hovering over 5 year highs, fell over 7% from the February peak. Bonds might carry less risk but they are barely keeping pace with inflation.

The things supposed to protect your portfolio started moving together.

Meanwhile, the world's wealthiest have been setting records in postwar and contemporary art.

After the dot-com bust, it grew roughly 24% annually for a decade. After 2008, roughly 11% annually for 12 years.

It trades globally in multiple currencies, has scarce supply, and has shown near-zero correlation to equities since 1995.*

Masterworks has helped 70,000+ investors allocate $1.3B fractionally across 500+ artworks featuring Banksy, Basquiat, and Picasso.

See if you can improve your portfolio performance in one diversified strategy.

*According to Masterworks data. Investing involves risk. Past performance is not indicative of future returns. Important Reg A disclosures: masterworks.com/cd

PRDs by voice. Bug reports by voice. Ship faster.

Dictate acceptance criteria and reproductions inside Cursor or Warp. Wispr Flow auto-tags file names, preserves syntax, and gives you paste-ready text in seconds. 4x faster than typing.

If you enjoyed this, you’d be doing us a HUGE FAVOR by just clicking the ad above - we appreciate it!

Keep Reading