🚀 Open a tab, ship an app
Replit started as a browser demo and became a place where anyone can go from idea → app in an afternoon. Open a tab. Engage with the chatbot. Click deploy. Done.

🚀 TL;DR
🛠️ It’s a coding workspace in your browser that can also deploy your app.
🤝 Built for learners, indie builders, and small teams who want speed over setup.
🤖 AI helps scaffold pages, wire APIs, and fix dumb errors.
💰 Just raised at $3.0B. The company says it’s running at about $150M a year pace.
⚠️ Risks: AI compute isn’t cheap, pros still love local tools, big tech can copy features.
Jargon:
“Annual Run Rate” = “Annual run rate is a quick estimate of yearly revenue, found by multiplying this month’s or quarter’s revenue by 12 or 4. This number includes both recurring revenue and one-time revenue streams”
“Post-money” or “Post Money Valuation” = Post-money valuation is the value of a company right after new investment money is added, simply calculated as its old value plus the fresh investment.
🧠 Amjad’s arc → product philosophy
Amjad Masad took early browser experiments (Repl.it) and turned them into a shareable, remixable coding space. The culture is simple: remove setup pain, learn with other people, and ship in the open.
“You can just have a prompt and have an app… set an afternoon to give it some good effort and try to get your first app. The bottleneck moves from execution to ideas.”
👤 The story of Amjad Masad
From tinkerer → teacher → platform builder.
Amjad grew up obsessed with making computers do things they “shouldn’t” be able to do, as well as sharing what he learned long before Replit was a company. That teacher’s instinct —explain clearly, remove friction, and let people try —shows up all over Replit. The earliest “pitches” weren’t slides; they were links you could open and use.
Immigrant founder playbook (done right).
He moved to the U.S., worked in product/engineering, and kept pushing one simple idea: code should run anywhere, instantly. Replit is that idea turned up to 11: zero setup, real-time collaboration, and now AI that helps you ship, built transparently with the community.
Fearless, public values.
Amjad is open about being Muslim and has been outspoken on Palestinian human rights and the dignity of Muslim communities worldwide. He stands as one of the most prominent Chief Executive in our community to take such a public stance. That willingness to take a stand on product, speech, and who gets to build shows up in Replit’s speed and ambition.

How that shows up in the product & community
Welcoming first-time builders, not just career devs. (Dhow built our front-end using Replit)
Decisions that reduce gatekeeping: you don’t need a $3k laptop or a CS degree to get started.
Clear, public roadmaps; fast iteration in the open.
“Large parts of software engineering are going to be automated… with Replit, people are making applications from scratch, so agents are going to start to work.”
🌙 Why Amjad proves our bullish thesis on Muslim founders
1) Mission clarity → product clarity.
Values-anchored founders build simple, useful products. Replit’s “open a tab, ship an app” is a mission you can feel.
2) Resilience under pressure.
Public identity + public stances = more scrutiny. The upside: thicker skin, faster iteration, sharper focus.
3) Global empathy, global distribution.
Diaspora networks mirror the market: students, self-taught builders, weekend founders across regions. Replit’s classroom-to-indie spread fits that pattern.
4) Teaching > posturing.
When a founder teaches, communities stick. Replit’s templates, tutorials, and social remixing aren’t side quests—they’re the moat.
5) Build in public courage.
Ship early, accept criticism, improve in daylight. That compounding honesty is magnetic for builders.
🛠️ What Replit actually does
Code in a tab: zero installs, instant sandbox.
One-click deploy: your app gets a live URL.
Templates: start from “Hello World” or a full stack.
Collab: invite a friend, pair in real time.
Teams/Edu: classrooms and small teams with basic admin stuff.
Bounties/marketplace: post small gigs or sell templates.
AI buddy: suggests code, stitches pieces together, and explains errors.
How Replit makes money
Free until you hit limits → upgrade.
If your app/AI usage grows → pay more.
Bounties/templates → Replit takes a small cut.
Teams/Edu → paid plans.
What people actually do
Learn → remix → tweak → deploy.
Weekend MVPs that become little SaaS projects.
Classroom projects that accidentally turn into real to
🌍 Why this market is bigger than you think
Don’t just count “professional developers.” Count anyone who can ship something useful - because the barrier of entry into software development is gone, and AI helps you over the bumps— whether we’re talking students, product folks, indie hackers, or hobbyists.
Some use cases
Weekend founder: spins up a micro-tool on Saturday, shares a link on Sunday, and first users by Monday.
Classroom → side hustle: kids finish a project, keep going, add Stripe, charge $5/month.

⚠️ The vibe‑coding wars (competitors)
Cursor / Windsurf / Bolt.new / Base44 → AI‑heavy web-based editors (fast on your own machine).
GitHub Codespaces / Gitpod / CodeSandbox → cloud dev environments for classic stacks.
VS Code / JetBrains / Zed → powerful local IDEs with deep plugin ecosystems.
Colab/Notebooks → data/ML prototyping.
Where Replit differs: zero‑setup in a tab, built‑in deploys, a social/learning surface, and AI that’s woven into the build‑and‑ship loop—not just code completion.
Risks in one breath: AI costs can swell; advanced builders may graduate to local tools; schools buy slowly; incumbents can bundle “good‑enough.”

ARR is closer to $150M as of Sept 2025 (via Sacra)
📈Traction at a glance
Annualized revenue: ~$150M (late ’25, company‑stated), up from an estimated ~$106M ARR in June ’25.
Paying vs. pro users: Mid‑’25 reports cited ~175k paying customers out of ~40M users; by late ’25, Replit claims 500k+ “professional users.” (That term may not map 1:1 to paid seats.)
Funding: Seed (Oct ’18) → A (Feb ’21) → B (Dec ’21; B‑1 & B‑2 Apr ’23) →
C (Sept ’25 @ $3.0B).
Reference share prices:
Seed $0.64–$1.38;
A $5.76;
B $32.19 (B‑1 $39.39; B‑2 $41.09);
C $91.51.
What’s changed lately:
AI is doing more of the “plumbing.” Agents are moving from front-end to building full-stack applications.
Deployments are faster and cleaner. Shareable links are basically the default.
The business is much bigger now. Raised at $3.0B; company says it’s running at about $150M ARR, up from $106M in June.

Parabolic Growth in Revenue
💵 Simple $10k outcomes
What would a $10,000 check be worth today if you had invested at different rounds, marked to $3.0B?
Entry Round | Date | Post-Money | $10k Marked @ $3.0B | MOIC |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seed | Oct 22, 2018 | $20.3M | $1.477M | 147.78× |
Series A | Feb 2021 | $140.0M | $214k | 21.43× |
Series B | Dec 2021 | $800.0M | $37.5k | 3.75× |
Series C / Latest | Sept 2025 | $3.0B | $10k | 1.00× |
Quick read: earlier = spicier. Seed checks can go parabolic if the company breaks out. A-round still prints real numbers. Even the B-round can be nice if the company continues to climb.
💥 Deeper cut: why small checks become big money
Early checks work because of simple math. If the company keeps leveling up, your fixed entry price gets marked up round after round. No fancy terms required.
Why Seed hits different
You’re buying against a tiny price tag ($20.3M).
If it’s later valued at $3.0B, your $10k is ~148× on paper.
If it keeps compounding (say $6–10B), the math keeps doing the work.
🎯 “What if” grid
If Replit eventually lands at these values, a $10k check would show roughly:
Exit Value | Seed @ $20.3M | Series A @ $140M | Series B @ $800M |
---|---|---|---|
$1B | $492k | $71k | $12.5k |
$3B | $1.477M | $214k | $37.5k |
$6B | $2.95M | $428k | $75k |
$10B | $4.926M | $714k | $125k |
Why this asset class is king :
Asymmetry: you can only lose your check, but the upside isn’t capped.
Compounding between rounds: each step-up multiplies your original entry.
Power law: most bets are small; a few go nuts and carry the whole bag.
Reality check:
It can take years to cash out.
Lots of early bets die.
Down rounds hurt too. That’s the game.
🐂 vs 🐻 The debate
Bull
AI lowers the bar to create → more builders show up.
Zero setup + instant deploy = shareable apps in a day.
Community/templates/bounties create a content flywheel.
From editor → Dev OS (more places to charge).
Bear
AI compute costs stay high.
Builders “graduate” to local IDEs/cloud and don’t look back.
Teams move slowly on security/compliance.
Big incumbents bundle “good enough.”
🔭 What we’re watching next
Agents that build whole advanced features, not just snippets.
Plan tweaks that push free users to paid (quiet but effective).
Education rollouts at the school district level.
Infra efficiency so AI costs don’t eat the margin.
Your career will thank you.
Over 4 million professionals start their day with Morning Brew—because business news doesn’t have to be boring.
Each daily email breaks down the biggest stories in business, tech, and finance with clarity, wit, and relevance—so you're not just informed, you're actually interested.
Whether you’re leading meetings or just trying to keep up, Morning Brew helps you talk the talk without digging through social media or jargon-packed articles. And odds are, it’s already sitting in your coworker’s inbox—so you’ll have plenty to chat about.
It’s 100% free and takes less than 15 seconds to sign up, so try it today and see how Morning Brew is transforming business media for the better.
At Dhow, we back this kind of energy: builders who strip out friction and ship in public, and we translate it for everyone who wants in. Replit is the blueprint. Open a tab, ship, compound. Our thesis is simple: when you widen the on-ramp to creation, value can accrue fast, and founders like Amjad, rooted in mission and community, tend to outrun the field. We are building Dhow to surface these stories early, cut the jargon, and give you clear ways to learn, build, and participate. If you have a founder we should cover next, or if you are building one yourself, hit reply and let’s make the next one together.
📚 Sources
TechCrunch (Sep 10, 2025): Replit raises $250M at $3B; company cites ~$150M annualized revenue.
Replit Press (Sep 10, 2025): Confirms $3B round; “$2.8M → $150M annualized revenue” growth claim.
Reuters (Sep 10, 2025): Independent wire confirming $250M @ $3B and run-rate context.
Bloomberg (Sep 10, 2025): Additional mainstream confirmation of round/valuation.
Sacra (Jul 29, 2025): Mid-’25 estimate ~$106M ARR; charts on growth and “vibe coding” cohort.
Business Insider / Big Technology Podcast (Aug 7, 2025): Amjad quotes on “prompt → app” and agents.
Vanta — Frameworks for Growth (Jun 30, 2025): Amjad interview on automation/agents.